Incidence, characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis in COVID-19 patients: Comparison with influenza and pre-pandemic data.

AIMS: This study characterized incidence, patient profiles, risk factors and outcomes of in-hospital diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients with COVID-19 compared with influenza and pre-pandemic data. METHODS: This study consisted of 13 383 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (March 2020-July 2022), 19 165 hospitalized patients with influenza (January 2018-July 2022) and 35 000 randomly sampled hospitalized pre-pandemic patients (January 2017-December 2019) in Montefiore Health System, Bronx, NY, USA. Primary outcomes were incidence of in-hospital DKA, in-hospital mortality, and insulin use at 3 and 6 months post-infection. Risk factors for developing DKA were identified. RESULTS: The overall incidence of DKA in patients with COVID-19 and influenza, and pre-pandemic were 2.1%, 1.4% and 0.5%, respectively (p < .05 pairwise). Patients with COVID-19 with DKA had worse acute outcomes (p < .05) and higher incidence of new insulin treatment 3 and 6 months post-infection compared with patients with influenza with DKA (p < .05). The incidence of DKA in patients with COVID-19 was highest among patients with type 1 diabetes (12.8%), followed by patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes (T2D; 5.2%), non-insulin dependent T2D (2.3%) and, lastly, patients without T2D (1.3%). Patients with COVID-19 with DKA had worse disease severity and higher mortality [odds ratio = 6.178 (4.428-8.590), p < .0001] compared with those without DKA. Type 1 diabetes, steroid therapy for COVID-19, COVID-19 status, black race and male gender were associated with increased risk of DKA. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DKA was higher in COVID-19 cohort compared to the influenza and pre-pandemic cohort. Patients with COVID-19 with DKA had worse outcomes compared with those without. Many COVID-19 survivors who developed DKA during hospitalization became insulin dependent. Identification of risk factors for DKA and new insulin-dependency could enable careful monitoring and timely intervention.

COVID-19 and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Observational Study From Eastern India on the Association Between Glycaemic Control and Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes has emerged as an important risk factor for causing severe illness and death from COVID-19. There is a paucity of structured data from the Indian subcontinent on the impact that glycaemic control (both immediate and remote) has on the degree of required medical intervention and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes between well-controlled and poorly controlled patients with T2DM and COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Data on 177 patients who were hospitalized between February 2021 and July 2021 were categorized into four groups using a cut-off admission plasma glucose of <200 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.5%. RESULTS: Patients with poorly controlled diabetes presented at a significantly older age than the other groups. Radiological findings suggested severe lung involvement in them. As a combined group patients with HbA1c ≥7.5% required more ventilatory requirement as compared with the group having HbA1c <7.5% irrespective of admission glucose. They also required prolonged hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) stays as compared with the well-controlled diabetes group. In this study, within similar ranges of HbA1c admission glucose seemed to have a numerical impact on mortality without being able to achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: From the current study, it can be concluded that poor glycaemic control, particularly HbA1c ≥7.5%, is an important risk factor for the development of severe COVID-19 and a predictor for the requirement of more intensive treatment and adverse treatment outcomes leading to increased hospital and ICU stay.

The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glycaemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus strain, COVID-19, was identified in Wuhan, China. The first case was reported in the Republic of Ireland that month. Since then, along with many other countries worldwide, Ireland has imposed intermittent strict lockdowns to mitigate the spread of the virus. AIMS: To investigate the impact of lockdown on glycaemic control in young adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Pre- and post-lockdown HbA1c levels were recorded for 118 patients attending the Young Adult Diabetes clinic in Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, and the results were compared. Changes in weight, insulin requirements and incidence of DKA/severe hypoglycaemia were also assessed. RESULTS: HbA1c results were 3.81 mmol/mol lower post-lockdown. Weight increased by 1.8 kg. Both of these results were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Lockdown was associated with improved glycaemic control in young adult diabetic patients, and also with an increase in body weight. Changes in lifestyle factors associated with lockdown may explain this finding.

DPP4 inhibitors: Could they be one of the solutions for COVID-19 patients with prediabetes?

Recent reports suggest that prediabetes is a risk factor for developing severe COVID-19 complications through underlying mechanisms involving undiagnosed sub-clinical inflammation. However, we remain without a clinical approach for managing COVID-19 in prediabetic cases. The subclinical inflammation in prediabetes is associated with elevated DPP4 levels and activity. DPP4 has pleiotropic actions, including glycaemia regulation and immuno-modulation. Recently, DPP4 has been recognised as a co-receptor for COVID-19 for entering host cells. In addition to improving glycaemia, DPP4 inhibition is associated with reduced inflammation. In this submission, we explore the potential use of DPP4 inhibitors as therapeutic agents for prediabetic patients in managing the deleterious effects of COVID-19. DPP4 inhibitors (gliptins) such as linagliptin and sitagliptin have therapeutic effects which have been shown to extend beyond glycaemic control with no risk of hypoglycaemia. By the nature of their mechanism of action, gliptins are not associated with hypoglycaemia, unlike their anti-glycaemic counterparts, as they mainly target postprandial glycaemia. Moreover, DPP4 inhibitors may represent a safer option for prediabetic individuals in managing prediabetes either as a prophylactic or curative treatment for COVID-19. We envisage that beyond improved glycaemic control, the use of DPP4 inhibitors would also alleviate the cytokine storm, resulting in a reduction in the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and consequently reducing the morbidity and mortality in prediabetic COVID-19 patients.

The Efficacy of Tele-Monitoring in Maintaining Glycated Haemoglobin Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: It is well documented that telemedicine offers effective accessibility and consistency which are useful in overcoming the barriers associated with the traditional delivery of chronic disease management. Furthermore, home-based telemonitoring approach for managing chronic disease conditions has been shown to break geographical barriers and facilitate provider-to-patient communication. However, the efficacy of telemedicine in reducing HbA1c is debatable. AIM: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effect of telemedicine on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHOD: This systematic review has been conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Searches were primarily conducted using the EBSCOhost database. Other search engines such as Cochrane Library and Google scholar were also used and search of grey literature was performed using google, NHS.uk website, WHO websites, and gov.uk website. Nine articles were included in this review. RESULTS: Three themes were identified in this review including diabetes education/telemonitoring technology and glycaemic control, the attitude of participants, and cost effectiveness of tele-medicine. While three studies reported improved glycaemic control with statistically significant improvement in HbA1c compared to the control group, three other studies did not find significant improvement in glycaemic control. In addition, the findings suggest that participants' positive attitude to self-care can lead to an improved HbA1c, and finally, several of the selected studies found that telemonitoring is not cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The findings of this review show that telemedicine may be effective in managing blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, factors such as educational level of patients, attitude and costs may limit its application in primary care. More studies are required to fully establish the effectiveness of Telemonitoring in managing patients with type 2 diabetes.

A doctor-nurse-patient mobile health management system effectively controls blood glucose in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus-2019 pandemic in China aroused increasing interest in telemedicine-supported glycaemic control. We hypothesize that age might influence usage and efficacy of telemedicine-supported glycaemic control. This study aims to measure the effects of a doctor-nurse-patient Mobile Health Management System (MHMS) for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Four hundred sixty four patients with T2DM were recruited. A one-hour diabetes education provided to each patient and subsequent follow-ups arranged in the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week after enrollment were recorded in MHMS. The effectiveness of MHMS was defined as the proportion of patients achieving FPG target (below 126 mg/dL or 7.0mml/L). RESULTS: Among the enrolled 464 patients (age: 55.0 ± 13.7 years) who were divided into three groups: young (18-40 years), middle-aged (41-65 years) and elderly (> 65 years), 424 ones completed all follow-ups of 12 weeks. FPG decreased from 178.38 ± 95.04 to 117.90 ± 14.22 mg/dL in the young group, from 180.00 ± 91.08 to 122.94 ± 37.95 mg/dL in the middle-aged group, and from 174.24 ± 80.64 to 128.88 ± 23.4 mg/dL in the elderly group. The proportion of FPG-target-achieved patients increased from 46.2 to 90.4% in the young group, from 32.6 to 82.8% in the middle-aged group, and from 29.5 to 73.3% in the elderly group. The proportion of FPG-target-achieved patients between three age groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001). And the changes of proportion of FPG-target-achieved patients at different follow-up times were statistically significant (P = 0.037). Compared with the young group, the elderly group achieved poorer FPG level (P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: MHMS can help patients with T2DM lower FPG and improve proportion of FPG-target-achieved patients. Younger patients may achieve better glycaemic control than older patients. MHMS may serve multitudinous patients with T2DM to achieve adequate FPG self-management.

Measuring the impact of community-based interventions on type 2 diabetes control during the COVID-19 pandemic in Cape Town - A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exposed the risks of poorly controlled noncommunicable diseases, especially in persons with diabetes. The pandemic outbreak in Cape Town, South Africa, required a rapid reorganisation of primary care services. Community-based measures were activated to ensure continuity of care by implementing home delivery of medication by community health workers. After five months of de-escalated chronic care, observations at an urban primary care facility suggested that noncommunicable disease patients had not overtly decompensated despite suspending regular in-facility services. This study attempted to understand what impact de-escalation of regular care and escalation of community-based interventions had on type 2 diabetes patients at this primary care facility. METHODS: A mixed methods study design was used, consisting of data captured prospectively from diabetic patients who returned to the facility for routine care post-lockdown, as well as qualitative interviews to ascertain patients' experiences of the home delivery service. RESULTS: The data set included 331 (72%) patients in the home delivery group and 130 (28%) in the non-home delivery group. Regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between home delivery and improved diabetic control (p  0.01), although this may be because of confounding factors. The mean glycaemic control was suboptimal both at baseline and post-lockdown in both groups. Interviews with 83 study patients confirmed the acceptability of the home delivery intervention. CONCLUSION: The rapid reorganisation of primary care services illustrates the versatility of a functional community-oriented primary care service, although not fully developed yet, to adapt to emerging community healthcare needs in the pandemic era.

Remote capillary blood collection for HbA1c measurement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A laboratory and patient perspective.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance and user acceptance of capillary blood samples prepared remotely using the MiniCollect® capillary blood collection device as an alternative to blood collection by venepuncture for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) analysis. METHODS: Following written informed consent, a cross-sectional study was conducted in individuals aged ≥18 years with any type of diabetes who routinely self-monitor their blood glucose. Eligible participants recruited whilst attending their routine clinical appointments were required to provide a venous blood sample, prepare a capillary blood sample at home (remotely) and complete a bespoke questionnaire. HbA1c in whole blood collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was determined by capillary electrophoresis on the Sebia Capillary's 3 Tera analyser following standard operating procedure. RESULTS: HbA1c results from both venous and capillary collection demonstrated good agreement. Passing-Bablok regression: y = 0 + 1x (p = 0.18), Spearman correlation r = 0.986, p < 0.0001. The Bland-Altman difference plot provided a mean difference of 0.3 mmol/mol (2.2%). Over half of the participants found the MiniCollect device easy to use. The majority of participants were in favour of the remote capillary blood collection service and would use it if routinely available. CONCLUSION: The home collection of capillary blood for HbA1c determination is a valuable and convenient alternative to standard venous blood collection as it provides an opportunity to support routine HbA1c monitoring, whilst mitigating the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. This service would additionally allow individuals to attend clinic visits with a HbA1c value, ensuring optimal continuance of patient care for individuals with diabetes.

Diabetes in the Western Cape, South Africa: A secondary analysis of the diabetes cascade database 2015 - 2020.

AIM: The aim was to describe the demographics, comorbidities and outcomes of care for patients with diabetes at primary care facilities in the Western Cape, South Africa, between 2015 and 2020. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the diabetes cascade database. RESULTS: The database included 116726 patients with mean age of 61.4 years and 63.8 % were female. The mean age at death was 66.0 years. Co-morbidities included hypertension (69.5 %), mental health disorders (16.2 %), HIV (6.4 %) and previous TB (8.2 %). Sixty-three percent had at least one previous hospital admission and 20.2 % of all admissions were attributed to cardiovascular diseases. Coronavirus was the third highest reason for admission over a 10-year period. Up to 70% were not receiving an annual HbA1c test. The mean value for the last HBA1c taken was 9.0%. Three-quarters (75.5 %) of patients had poor glycaemic control (HbA1c >7 %) and a third (33.7 %) were very poorly controlled (HbA1c>10 %). Glycaemic control was significantly different between urban sub-districts and rural areas. Renal disease was prevalent in 25.5 %. CONCLUSION: Diabetes was poorly controlled with high morbidity and mortality. There was poor compliance with guidelines for HbA1c and eGFR measurement. At least 7% of diabetic patients were being admitted for complications annually.

Glycated hemoglobin at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and at follow-up in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the diagnostic delay and the subsequent quality of care during the Covid-19 pandemic among children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We compared the HbA1c levels of 3111 children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and of 2825 children at a median follow-up of 4.7 months (interquartile range, 4.1-5.4) together with their daily insulin requirement during the Covid-19 pandemic with the two previous years via multivariable linear regression, using data from the German Diabetes Registry DPV. RESULTS: During the Covid-19 pandemic, HbA1c levels were higher at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (mean estimated difference, 0.33% [95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.43], p < 0.001), but not at follow-up (mean estimated difference, 0.02% [-0.02-0.07]). Children with diabetes onset during the Covid-19 pandemic had a significantly higher daily insulin requirement after initiation of therapy (mean estimated difference, 0.08 U/kg [0.06-0.10], p < 0.001). Both the increase in HbA1c and daily insulin requirement were evident only after the first wave of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: This increase in HbA1c at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes during the Covid-19 pandemic may indicate a delay in seeking medical care due to the pandemic. However, this did not affect short-term glycemic control. The increased insulin requirement at follow-up could suggest a more rapid autoimmune progression during the pandemic.

Glycaemic control during the COVID-19 pandemic: A catastrophe or a sign of hope for the person with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus?

Introduction: In a person with type 1 diabetes, any change concerning daily routine may lead to changes in glycaemic control. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of work and lockdown on glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort was stratified into three activity groups (g1-students/telework/laid-off; g2-unemployed/retired; g3-work without lockdown). Continuous and categorical variations (reductions ≥ 0.4%) in glycated haemoglobin were obtained in 2020 (t3:December/2019-March/2020; t4:April/2020-July/2020) and in homologous periods of 2019. Intragroup comparisons between years and intergroups in the same year were made. Regression models were developed to predict the variation of glycated haemoglobin in 2020. Results: 241 participants were included, with a significant reduction between t4 and t3 (vs. t2 and t1) in g1 (p < 0.001) and g2 (p = 0.025) and in 2020 in g1 (vs. g2, p < 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001). Only g1 presented superiority in the reduction ≥0.4% in glycated haemoglobin in 2020 (vs. 2019, p < 0.001; vs. g2, p < 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001). The insulin regimens were comparable and the development of hypoglycaemia was found to be superimposed between t3 and t4, except for g1, which was higher at t3 (p = 0.029). G1 correlated with continuous reductions (vs. g2, p = 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001) and ≥0.4% in glycated haemoglobin in 2020 (vs. g2, OR 3.6, p < 0.001; vs. g3, OR 12.7, p < 0.001), regardless of the age and duration of type 1 diabetes. Conclusions: A more stable and better glycaemic control was observed in participants who transitioned from face-to-face work to total lockdown.

Introducción: En una persona con diabetes tipo 1, cualquier cambio en la rutina diaria puede provocar cambios en el control glucémico. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el impacto del trabajo y el confinamiento en el control glucémico en adultos con diabetes tipo 1. Material y métodos: Se estratificó una cohorte retrospectiva en tres grupos de actividad (g1-estudiantes/teletrabajo/despido; g2-desempleados/jubilados; g3-trabajo sin encierro). Se obtuvieron variaciones continuas y categóricas (reducciones ≥ 0,4%) en la hemoglobina glucosilada en 2020 (t3: diciembre/2019-marzo/2020; t4: abril/2020-julio/2020) y en períodos homólogos de 2019. Se desarrollaron modelos de regresión para predecir la variación de la hemoglobina glucosilada en 2020. Resultados: Se incluyeron 241 participantes, con una reducción significativa entre t4 y t3 (vs. t2 y t1) en g1 (p < 0,001) y g2 (p = 0,025) y en 2020 en g1 (vs. g2, p < 0,001; vs. g3, p < 0,001). Solo g1 demostró superioridad en la reducción ≥ 0,4% de la hemoglobina glucosilada en 2020 (vs. 2019, p < 0,001; vs. g2, p < 0,001; vs. g3, p < 0,001). Los regímenes de terapia con insulina fueron comparables y el desarrollo de hipoglucemia fue superponible entre t3 y t4, excepto para g1, que fue mayor en t3 (p = 0,029). G1 se correlacionó con reducciones continuas (vs. g2, p = 0,001; vs. g3, p < 0,001) y ≥ 0,4% en la hemoglobina glucosilada en 2020 (vs. g2, odds ratio [OR] 3,6, p < 0,001; vs. g3, OR 12,7, p < 0,001), independientemente de la edad y la duración de la diabetes tipo 1. Conclusiones: Se observó un control glucémico más optimizado a los participantes que pasaron del trabajo presencial al confinamiento total.

Effectiveness of a nurse-led smartphone-based self-management programme for people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led smartphone-based self-management programme (NSSMP) on improving self-efficacy, promoting diabetes self-care, increasing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and decreasing HbA1c, acute complications and unplanned medical consultation for people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes compared with a nurse-led diabetic service (NDS). DESIGN: A two-arm randomized controlled trial with repeated measures was conducted. METHODS: Participants were recruited from June 2018 to September 2020. Eligible participants were assigned to either the intervention or control group randomly. Participants assigned to intervention group received the 6-month NSSMP, while those in the control group received existing NDS provided by the study hospital. Outcomes were measured at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 114 participants were recruited. There were no significant interactions between group and time for all the outcomes except for blood glucose testing activities (F = 4.742, p = .015). Both groups had reduced HbA1c over 6 months. The intervention group had a lower HbA1c than the control group at follow-ups, but the differences were not statistically significant. None of the participants had acute diabetes complications at follow-up. Similarly, the differences in the number of unplanned medical consultation at 6-month follow-up between two groups were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: The NSSMP is as effective as existing NDS provided by the study hospital in improving most of the outcomes. NSSMP can liberate valuable time for nurses to provide care to critically ill patients and supports healthcare resource constraints in the current COVID-19 pandemic. IMPACT: The existing diabetes service is labour intensive as nurses are required to deliver education, follow-up telephone calls to trace blood sugar monitoring and provide therapeutic consultations and necessary referrals. The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has added further strain on the overworked professionals. NSSMP provides an alternative programme that is just as effective, to reduce nurses' workload by delegating them back to the individuals through self-management strategies. This enables nurses to increase contact time with patients, and individuals to take onus of their disease through increased self-efficacy, facilitated by technology. CLINICAL TRIAL: This study is registered under clinical registration number NCT03088475.

Dietary carbohydrate restriction augments weight loss-induced improvements in glycaemic control and liver fat in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Lifestyle modification and weight loss are cornerstones of type 2 diabetes management. However, carbohydrate restriction may have weight-independent beneficial effects on glycaemic control. This has been difficult to demonstrate because low-carbohydrate diets readily decrease body weight. We hypothesised that carbohydrate restriction enhances the beneficial metabolic effects of weight loss in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This open-label, parallel RCT included adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 48-97 mmol/mol (6.5-11%), BMI >25 kg/m2, eGFR >30 ml min-1 [1.73 m]-2 and glucose-lowering therapy restricted to metformin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Participants were randomised by a third party and assigned to 6 weeks of energy restriction (all foods were provided) aiming at ~6% weight loss with either a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet (CRHP, percentage of total energy intake [E%]: CH30/P30/F40) or a conventional diabetes diet (CD, E%: CH50/P17/F33). Fasting blood samples, continuous glucose monitoring and magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used to assess glycaemic control, lipid metabolism and intrahepatic fat. Change in HbA1c was the primary outcome; changes in circulating and intrahepatic triacylglycerol were secondary outcomes. Data were collected at Copenhagen University Hospital (Bispebjerg and Herlev). RESULTS: Seventy-two adults (CD 36, CRHP 36, all white, 38 male sex) with type 2 diabetes (mean duration 8 years, mean HbA1c 57 mmol/mol [7.4%]) and mean BMI of 33 kg/m2 were enrolled, of which 67 (CD 33, CRHP 34) completed the study. Body weight decreased by 5.8 kg (5.9%) in both groups after 6 weeks. Compared with the CD diet, the CRHP diet further reduced HbA1c (mean [95% CI] -1.9 [-3.5, -0.3] mmol/mol [-0.18 (-0.32, -0.03)%], p = 0.018) and diurnal mean glucose (mean [95% CI] -0.8 [-1.2, -0.4] mmol/l, p < 0.001), stabilised glucose excursions by reducing glucose CV (mean [95% CI] -4.1 [-5.9, -2.2]%, p < 0.001), and augmented the reductions in fasting triacylglycerol concentration (by mean [95% CI] -18 [-29, -6]%, p < 0.01) and liver fat content (by mean [95% CI] -26 [-45, 0]%, p = 0.051). However, pancreatic fat content was decreased to a lesser extent by the CRHP than the CD diet (mean [95% CI] 33 [7, 65]%, p = 0.010). Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA2-IR and cholesterol concentrations (total, LDL and HDL) were reduced significantly and similarly by both diets. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Moderate carbohydrate restriction for 6 weeks modestly improved glycaemic control, and decreased circulating and intrahepatic triacylglycerol levels beyond the effects of weight loss itself compared with a CD diet in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Concurrent differences in protein and fat intakes, and the quality of dietary macronutrients, may have contributed to these results and should be explored in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03814694. FUNDING: The study was funded by Arla Foods amba, The Danish Dairy Research Foundation, and Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg.

Impact of COVID‐19 on glycaemic control in a Spanish cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID‐19 lockdown on monitoring and glycaemic control of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a Spanish population.This prospective cohort study focused on patients with T2DM from a Spanish cohort followed since 2017, with at least one HbA1c determination since the start of the pandemic.A total of 246 patients was included;45.9% (113) had at least one HbA1c measurement during the pandemic and, in this case, we used the most recent one. The HbA1c mean value increased from 7.37% before the pandemic to 7.43% (p = 0.63). Those patients with previous HbA1c ≥ 8.5% were the ones whose glycaemic controlled worsened: uncontrolled patients increased from 10.5% to 28.6% (p < 0.05), relative risk 1.65.In conclusion, nine months after the pandemic start, less than a half of the T2DM patients in our Spanish cohort had at least one HbA1c measurement. Glycaemic control was similar when comparing before versus after the pandemic start, although those patients who were previously poorly controlled had a 1.65 higher risk of worsening their glycaemic control compared to the rest. Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons.

Utilisation of telehealth for outpatient diabetes management during COVID-19 pandemic: how did the patients fare?

BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many outpatient services at public hospitals, including diabetes services, had adopted telehealth appointments for their clinic patients. There was concern that patients' glycaemic control may worsen during the pandemic. AIM: To assess glycaemic control of patients with diabetes attending telehealth consultations in 2020, compared to face-to-face reviews prior to pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with diabetes managed by telehealth consultations over 5 months at two metropolitan hospitals in Sydney. Their attendance rate, glycaemic control and unplanned admissions to hospital were assessed, and these were compared with the same period 12 months prior when patients were reviewed via face-to-face appointments. RESULTS: Between April and September 2020, the attendance rate for telehealth consultation at the diabetes services at the two hospitals was 88.9% (884 out of 994), which was higher than in 2019 (85.2%; 818 out of 959; P = 0.016) when patients attended via face-to-face appointments. Of the 629 patients reviewed via telehealth in 2020 and who had been with our service for over 12 months, glycaemic control was better in 2020 (HbA1c 7.8 ± 1.4% (62 ± 15 mmol/mol)) compared with 12 months earlier (8.2 ± 1.7% (66 ± 19 mmol/mol); P < 0.001). There was no difference in the number of unplanned admissions for this cohort in 2020 (n = 58; 9.2%) compared with 2019 (n = 75; 11.9%; P = 0.100). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that for patients with diabetes who received care via telehealth consultations during the COVID-19 lockdown, their glycaemic control was slightly better, and unplanned admission rates were not higher compared with those in the pre-COVID-19 period. Telehealth consultation offers an important care delivery option in the management of patients with diabetes under these circumstances.

Hyperglycaemia in COVID-19: improving recognition and management in a single centre

Background: Hyperglycaemia is a recognised complication of COVID-19 disease and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Effects are noted in individuals with and without diabetes and potentiated by the use of recognised COVID-19 treatments such as corticosteroids. Early glycaemic control in the inpatient with COVID-19 disease impacts significantly on outcomes. Methods: A three-phase improvement project evaluated the recognition and management of hyperglycaemia in 120 adult inpatients with COVID-19 disease over a 4-month period. A local guideline and a separate acute care 'bundle' were implemented to improve performance. The main outcomes of the project were evaluated in a repeated cross-sectional design;assessing the performance of regular capillary blood glucose monitoring and appropriate treatment of hyperglycaemia where indicated. Results: Prior to intervention, 78.6% of patients had appropriate capillary blood glucose monitoring and no patients were deemed to receive appropriate treatment. Following interventions, 83-100% of patients had appropriate monitoring and 75-100% received appropriate treatment. Conclusions: In this setting, implementation of a guideline and a care bundle contributed towards improved recognition and management of hyperglycaemia in patients with COVID-19 disease. Future study could assess the impact of interventions on a larger scale whilst investigating variation in the subtype of diabetes, patient sex and other demographics on outcomes such as length of stay, morbidity and mortality.

Glycated haemoglobin levels among 3295 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with and without diabetes, and risk of severe infection, admission to an intensive care unit and all-cause mortality.

AIM: To determine the risk of adverse outcomes across the spectrum of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Danish nationwide registries were used to study the association between HbA1c levels and 30-day risk of all-cause mortality and the composite of severe COVID-19 infection, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and all-cause mortality. The study population comprised patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (3 March 2020 to 31 December 2020) with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and an available HbA1c ≤ 6 months before the first positive PCR test. All patients had at least 30 days of follow-up. Among patients with diabetes, HbA1c was categorized as <48 mmol/mol, 48 to 53 mmol/mol, 54 to 58 mmol/mol, 59 to 64 mmol/mol (reference) and >64 mmol/mol. Among patients without diabetes, HbA1c was stratified into <31 mmol/mol, 31 to 36 mmol/mol (reference), 37 to 41 mmol/mol and 42 to 47 mmol/mol. Thirty-day standardized absolute risks and standardized absolute risk differences are reported. RESULTS: We identified 3295 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with an available HbA1c (56.2% male, median age 73.9 years), of whom 35.8% had diabetes. The median HbA1c was 54 and 37 mmol/mol among patients with and without diabetes, respectively. Among patients with diabetes, the standardized absolute risk difference of the composite outcome was higher with HbA1c < 48 mmol/mol (12.0% [95% confidence interval {CI} 3.3% to 20.8%]) and HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol (15.1% [95% CI 6.2% to 24.0%]), compared with HbA1c 59 to 64 mmol/mol (reference). Among patients without diabetes, the standardized absolute risk difference of the composite outcome was greater with HbA1c < 31 mmol/mol (8.5% [95% CI 0.5% to 16.5%]) and HbA1c 42 to 47 mmol/mol (6.7% [95% CI 1.3% to 12.1%]), compared with HbA1c 31 to 36 mmol/mol (reference). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 and HbA1c < 48 mmol/mol or HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol had a higher associated risk of the composite outcome. Similarly, among patients without diabetes, varying HbA1c levels were associated with higher risk of the composite outcome.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Lockdown on Glycaemic Control: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study in a Tertiary Setting.

We analysed the effects of Swiss national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycaemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. In a retrospective observational cohort study with observation period 16 December 2018-27 July 2020, we included tertiary care patients with diabetes and at least one glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement before and after the lockdown beginning. Main outcome measure was change in HbA1c after the lockdown. We included 1078 patients (86% diabetes type 2) with a mean HbA1c of 55.63 mmol/mol (7.24%). Glycaemic control was susceptible to seasonal changes with higher mean HbA1c in winter as compared to spring (57.49 mmol/mol (7.41%) vs. 55.52 mmol/mol (7.23%), p = 0.013). The lockdown did not affect the mean HbA1c values of all patients. However, we found a higher proportion of type 2 diabetes patients with a worsening HbA1c after the lockdown as compared to the year before (32% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.02). In a mixed-model regression multivariable analysis, inappropriate alcohol intake and hypothyroidism were associated with an increase in HbA1c after the lockdown. In conclusion, the national lockdown had no effect on overall mean HbA1c values but affected a proportion of type 2 diabetes patients with worsening HbA1c, whose individual risk factors were identified.

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on glycaemic control and lifestyle changes in children and adolescents with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: Malaysia implemented nationwide lockdown from 18th March till 3rd May 2020 to mitigate the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This study aimed to examine the impact of the lockdown on glycaemic control and lifestyle changes in children and adolescents with type 1 (T1DM) and 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aged less than 18 years old. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, interviews and a standardised questionnaire comparing lifestyle changes before and during the lockdown were performed in follow-up clinic visits after the lockdown. Anthropometry measurements and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values were compared 3 months prior and after the lockdown. RESULTS: Participants were 93 patients with T1DM (11.08 ± 3.47 years) and 30 patients with T2DM (13.81 ± 2.03 years). Male gender, T2DM and pubertal adolescents were found to have a significant deterioration in glycaemic control. A significant increment of HbA1c was observed in patients with T2DM (8.5 ± 0.40 vs 9.9 ± 0.46%), but not in patients with T1DM (8.6 ± 0.28 vs 8.7 ± 0.33%). Contrarily, there was an improved glycaemic control in pre-pubertal T1DM children likely due to parental supervision during home confinement. Weight and BMI SDS increased in T1DM patients but surprisingly reduced in T2DM patients possibly due to worsening diabetes control. Reduced meal frequency mainly due to skipping breakfast, reduced physical activity level scores, increased screen time and sleep duration were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse impact on glycaemic control and lifestyle were seen mostly in patients with T2DM and pubertal adolescent boys.

Elevated HbA1c levels in pre-Covid-19 infection increases the risk of mortality: A sistematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Diabetes is emerging as a risk factor for coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 prognosis. However, contradictory findings have been reported regarding the impact of glycaemic control on COVID-19 outcome. The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the impact of hospital pre-admission or at-admission values of HbA1c on COVID-19 mortality or worsening in patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus up to 30th December 2020. Eligibility criteria for study selection were the following: (1)enrolling patients with any form of diabetes mellitus and hospitalized for COVID-19 and (2) reporting data regarding HbA1c values before infection or at hospital admission in relation to COVID-19 mortality or worsening. Descriptive statistics, HbA1c values, odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios were extracted from seven observational studies and generic inverse variance (random effects) of OR was used to estimate the effect of HbA1c on COVID-19 outcome. RESULTS: HbA1c was linearly associated with an increased COVID-19 mortality or worsening when considered as a continuous variable (OR 1.01 [1.01, 1.01]; p < 0.00001). Similarly, when analysing studies providing the number of events according to the degree of glycaemic control among various strata, a significantly increased risk was observed with poor glycaemic control (OR 1.15 [1.11, 1.19]; p < 0.00001), a result corroborated by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the large heterogeneity in study design and patients' characteristics in the few available studies, data suggest that patients with diabetes and poor glycaemic control before infection might have an increased risk of COVID-19 related mortality.